![]() An Army Turned Inward: Reforming the Insurrection Act to Guard Against Abuse May 6, 2023.The Case for Attempted Perfidy: An “Attempt” to Enhance Deterrent Value June 10, 2023.Lawfare and Sea Power: A Historical Perspective June 10, 2023.China’s Anti-Monopoly Merger Control and National Security: Interactions with Foreign Investment Law and Beyond June 10, 2023.A Bellicose Founding Charter: The US and Providing for the “Common Defence” June 10, 2023.Advanced Reactors and Nuclear Terrorism: Rethinking the International Framework June 10, 2023.Congressional and Supreme Court Restraints on Treaty Termination Carried Out at the President’s “Lowest Ebb” of Authority June 10, 2023.The interview was also a live taping of the ABA’s National Security Law Today podcast. The two drew from their wealth of experience to cover challenges to shifting to great power competition, and how the Biden Administration should think about China. Professor James Feinerman from Georgetown’s Center for Asian Law interviewed former Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg. Keynote: James Steinberg, former US Deputy Secretary of State This panel discussed the human rights situation in China, and the implications of the Chinese human rights abuses on US national security policy. Panel 3: Chinese Human Rights Challenges for the Biden Administration-The Uyghur People, Hong Kong, and Developing Trendsįrom harsh crackdowns in Hong Kong under a new Chinese National Security Law to mass internments of Uyghur’s in Xinjiang, allegations of Chinese Human Rights abuses have filled the news over the last few years. The panel discussed different perspectives from stakeholders in the region and strategies for the future of the South China Sea. As China continues to increase its military presence and build islands, the United States closely monitors the security implications. The South China Sea has long been a contentious area of complex territorial and maritime disputes between several nations over the abundance of natural resources in the region. Panel 2: Competition in the South China Sea This panel discussed the Biden administration’s approach to these technology disputes and how emerging complications, like the Microsoft Exchange hack recently attributed to China, will change the conversation. The Trump Administration took aggressive steps to try and combat China’s growing technology influence Starting with Huawei’s 5G and culminating in a series of executive actions to try and effectively ban Chinese owned apps like TikTok and WeChat. The rapid global expansion in Chinese technologies has created a risk of national security vulnerabilities in the United States. and China Technology Disputes: ZTE, TikTok, and the Security Implications March 23-24, 2021 | Zoom Webinar Shifting to Great Power Competition: Emerging and Continuing Threats with China Panel 1: U.S. Nicholas Rasmussen (see biography above) Panel 3 – Social Media Misinformation in the Age of Trump, Election Integrity, and COVID-19 (2:15 – 3:45 p.m.) Leah West, Assistant Professor of International Affairs at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University.Joshua Geltzer, Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Homeland Security Advisor at National Security Council, The White House.Carrie Cordero, Senior Fellow and General Counsel, Center for a New American Security Adjunct Professor of Law. ![]() MODERATOR: Mary McCord, Visiting Professor of Law Executive Director, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection This panel will discuss a national strategy for countering domestic terrorism, including the need for a domestic terrorism statute and the application of 18 U.S.C. Panel 2: Hate or Terrorism? The First Amendment and Domestic Terrorism in the United States after Janu(10:50 a.m. Amanda Shanor, Assistant Professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.Lauren Cherry, Lieutenant Commander in the U.S.Sahar Aziz, Professor of Law, Rutgers University Law Schoo.MODERATOR: Laura Donohue, Director, Georgetown Center on National Security and the Law Ohio and the infamous “Unite the Right” rally and implications of United States v. This panel will address threats of violence, including the doctrine established in Brandenburg v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |